A visitor made this following comment towards 911blogger.com, on His Web blog
here is a short transcript from it
>>Please forward
this widely.<<
>>http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html
Please do NOT forward this widely - the 911blogger site
1) hosts disinformation about 9/11 via sites and videos that push the idea that NO
COMMERCIAL JET hit the towers in NYC.
2) links to sites where 9/11 researchers attack other
researchers personally and with vitriol (WingTv)
3) Links prominently to right-winger Karl Schwarz,
the center of a great deal of debate and who hosts links to sites which promote ideas that
MISSILES WERE FIRED AT THE WTC.
This is disinformation. Please do not link to 911 blogger,
who either knowingly or unknowingly is not spreading the good stuff, but a mix of the worst
and the best. There's no reason to promote the worst disinfo.
Please make your own video or find another way.
Reader
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 12:37 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
jeezus christ!
i just read the comments about my blog
(i run 911blogger.com) and i am shocked.
first off, what site do i link to that says no commercial jet hit
the towers?
second, wingtv's link will soon be removed because
of their new feud with alex jones
third, karl schwarz is prominent on my site because
he was willing to link to my site when i was first starting it.. same for rbnlive.com.. that
and articles about him have come out recently, and so i covered them.
look, all i am doing at 911blogger.com is trying to blog
the work done by all sorts of 9/11 researchers,
im not trying to force opinions, im just covering the 9/11 related news
as i see it. i am more than receptive to suggestions and comments..
but if youve got issues then talk to me, dont go to some other blog and bash me.
-dz
dz [911blog@gmail.com]
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 13:28 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
I know the owner
of 911blogger.com and he is a good man.
He posts relevant 9/11 information.
The 9/11 Truth Movement wouldn't even
have the David Ray Griffin
video had it not been for him. Try focusing on unity, and
not who is disinfo and who
isn't. Pointing out who
is disinformation is disinformation.
Jon Gold [gold9472@comcast.net]
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 14:07 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
And another thing...
if you want to have a serious discussion about 9/11, come to MY
Jon Gold [gold9472@comcast.net]
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 14:11 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
>>jeezus
christ!
>>i just read the comments about my blog (i run >>911blogger.com) and i am shocked.
I'm sorry you
are shocked. I know of another person who has emailed you about the DVDs, 'In
Plane Site' and 'Loose Change,' both of which suggest that no commercial jet hit the towers
- and they are still on your site. Please consider removing them.
>>first off, what site do i link to that says no commercial jet hit the towers?
The DVDs, 'In Plane Site' and 'Loose Change' promote these ideas - sounds like you didn't
know. Similarly, 'Team 8' promotes plane swapping, no commercial jet at the Pentagon, and
links to sites like 'Serendipity,' which pushes ideas like how the towers weren't hit by
commerical jets and thus the debris that was seen when they impacted was actually fake
debris that was planted in canisters . . . etc.
>>second, wingtv's link will soon be removed because of their new feud with alex jones
Glad to hear that, although if you look on their front page, there are many reasons beyond
Alex Jones to remove them. Why did you have them there in the first place?
>>third, karl schwarz is prominent on my site because he was willing to link to my site when
i was first starting it.. same for rbnlive.com.. that and articles about him have come out
recently, and so i covered them.
Karl's site, among other things, links to sites
like 'Letsroll911,' whose primary purpose is to promote pods
and missiles. Karl obviously doesn't care about
promoting disinfo. Now you know, if you didn't before.
When you link to good sites, your traffic will increase on its own.
You don't need to link to sites that don't discriminate.
>>look, all i am doing at 911blogger.com is trying to blog the work
done by all sorts of 9/11 researchers, im not trying to force opinions, im just covering the
9/11 related news as i see it. i am more than receptive to suggestions and comments..
but if youve got issues then talk to me, dont go to some other blog and bash me.
You're right, but since my friend had already emailed you and
nothing had changed, I figured you weren't open to listening.
You've made your case on here that you didn't know. Good enough.
Now you do. Glad to see the changes on your site and
I'll email you directly next time.
If you want to understand more about disinfo in the 9/11 movement,
the best place to start is here:
Please read it in detail if you are going to host things
like videos of Griffin - you're making an important contribution and you need to be up to
speed quickly.
Thanks
reader
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 15:17 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
Mr. Reader...
You are correct... focusing on problems that can't be proven, leaves people with "Magic
Bullet" like awareness. However, ANYTHING that gets people interested is a good thing.
ANYTHING to make people question what happened is a good thing.
However...
Phil Jayhan is scum who is out to make a buck off of the travesty that is 9/11. I do not
condone what he does, and I think people should avoid his site.
The reason the 9/11 Truth Movement hasn't succeeded is because too many people are focused
on what is disinformation, and what isn't. Only if we unify towards one goal, which for me,
has always been absolute truth, and absolute accountability, can we truly succeed.
I visited your site briefly, and the first thing mentioned is why certain stories are
misleading, etc...
That doesn't help the 9/11 Truth Movement either because it makes people question what it is
they "believe", which, in turn, makes them question what it is they're questioning.
ABSOLUTE TRUTH AND ABSOLUTE ACCOUNTABILITY. FOCUS.
Jon Gold [gold9472@comcast.net]
comment added :: 4th May 2005, 18:24 GMT-07
A visitor made this comment,
reader,
>>>>first
off, what site do i link to that says no commercial jet hit the towers?
>>The DVDs, 'In Plane Site' and 'Loose Change' promote these ideas - sounds like you didn't
know.
i do have both of these videos in my 9/11 related videos section.. but i also have alot of
other films listed.. when you said 'no commercial jet hit the towers' i was thinking you
were referring to the 'hologram' theories that some push.. i do not promote awareness of
9/11 by showing 'pod' footage, or 'hologram' footage, or anything of the sort.. i just blog
9/11 related news and was trying to make a quick list of 9/11 related films for people to
research, not make personal judgements as to which films are right and which are wrong.. in
fact, you could post a comment to those threads with your opinions, thats what comments are
for..
>>>>second, wingtv's link will soon be removed because of their new feud with alex jones
>>Glad to hear that, although if you look on their front page, there are many reasons beyond
Alex Jones to remove them. Why did you have them there in the first place?
i did a graphics work for them not too long ago for their 9/11 on trial segment.. up until
recently i had overlooked their bashing of ruppert (which perhaps wasnt in my best
judgement).. but since they do routinely discuss 9/11 i put them as a link on my site..
as for karl's site linking to letsroll911.org.. he links to tons and tons of sites on his..
he probably is linking to everything that is available and leaving it up to his viewers to
do their own research..
as for your friend emailing me.. i just did a search on my emails and came across a long
email from oilempire.us.. im assuming thats the one you speak of.. i will look through it
again.. i am somewhat familiar with this site, but did not pay much attention to the email
due to the amount of email i have gotten and because the email was just a flooding of links,
not someone asking me a question or making suggestions..
in any event.. i am trying to promote awareness, not get involved with the constant
infighting between the 'pod' people and the non-'pod' people, etc.. in fact i decided to go
public with my blog in the hopes of getting away from all the constant infighting in the
9/11 community.. it is not my goal to promote or endorse specific theories such as the
'pod', or in plane swapping, etc. etc. what i am trying to do is tell people to pay
attention and do their own research and come to their own conclusions.. i hope you can see
that not getting involved in the arguements in the community but rather just covering
anything new about 9/11 that i can peak intrest in viewers to pay attention and to start
their own researching.. i am not coming out on my website trying to shove my opinions down
people's throat, i am just blogging any new 9/11 related news.
i hope we have some sort of better understanding at this point, and that you will email me
personally in the future.. i have requested that people send in 9/11 related website links
that i should have listed and any comments about those that i have which perhaps i should
not have listed.. please feel free to email me with your opinions.. i hope in the future you
might not attack someone trying to be active in the 9/11 community as that is exactly the
thing that keeps us all divided.
thanks for the response,
-dz
dz [911blog@gmail.com]