Searching for the truth takes much "sifting through piles and piles of informaton"
This site has pile or two, to go through
A new video is being released by this site in
Auggst 2006 on Court TV
Video clip of Michael Moore asking why....
we have seen no video footage of any airplane
hitting the Pentagone?
Good Question - I have been asking it for 61/2 years now.
SHOW ME THE PLANE?
One-Time GOP Insider Claims He Has Sept. 11 ‘Smoking Gun’
Architect of GOP Resurgence Says Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower
By Greg Szymanski
A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher thinks he has stumbled across what may be
the “smoking gun,” proving the U.S. government’s official story about the WTC attacks is an “unequivocal
lie.”
Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., who several years ago began exposing corruption amongst the neo-conservative
movement in a book entitled A One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas, now has set his sights on proving government complicity in
9-11.
For years, the successful business entrepreneur and conservative Republican, once asked by the RNC to run against
Bill Clinton for Arkansas governor, has been using his inside political and business clout to expose corruption among the
neo-cons in the Bush administration.
He strayed away from the Bush agenda two years after being one of the lead orchestrators
in the Republican Party takeover of Congress during the Clinton administration.
“I designed the strategy that
took the House and Senate from Clinton,” recalls Schwarz, also a strong supporter and strategist for President George
H. W. Bush. “I designed that takeover two years before I realized the Republican ‘Contract with America’
was actually a ‘Contract on America.’ ”
After his political reawakening, Schwarz began blasting the
neo-cons where it hurt most—in their pocketbooks—coming forward with evidence regarding oil deals and government
involvement with the Taliban and Pakistan.
In his book and his ongoing seven-part series of articles entitled “Pop
Goes the Bush Mythology Bubble,” he provides inside information about countless financial scams, essentially revealing
that the Bush motive behind the Middle East invasion was more about oil profits than the war on terrorism.
Saying the
neo-cons within the government are destroying America for their own corporate-global benefits, Schwarz doesn’t mince
words and is calling for the impeachment of Bush, as well as removal of any member of Congress who aids and abets the corrupt
powers.
Now, moving away from financial corruption, he has turned his attention to the 9-11 truth movement, saying
he has found a piece of obscure video footage that shows that the government lied about what type of plane struck the south
tower of the WTC.
Schwarz admits he had a “whole lot” of luck when running across the video footage in
a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.
Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute,
52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737
airliner striking the south tower.
“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from
the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not
a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to
prove its authenticity.
“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously
reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11
is untrue.”
Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767.
However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence
that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.
“Not even
two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz. Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas
that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:
•
Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one
of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.
•
Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the
Middle East.
“Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing
their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.
Asked
how he would describe himself, since many critics may consider him a disgruntled Republican, he said:
“I am
conservative, fiscally responsible, an ecumenical Christian and an American patriot who clearly understands fascism and clearly
sees this is exactly what is going on within the Bush administration.
“To answer my critics, they can say whatever.
However, those who read my book will clearly see that the main problem now facing America has been caused and amplified by
the last three presidential administrations, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II.”
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given
to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
Not really a comment to me directly, but I felt it was appropriate to the research
I (Dave Nesbitt) read with
interest your [APFN] article titled: Military Video Of Flt 77 Hitting Pentagon - Critics See No Plane (an rense.com)
You'll
be interested to know that I was watching the events of 911 on tv, live and Dan Rather (could have been Peter Jennings)
had an eyewitness to the plane that allegedly hit the pentagon. He clearly stated that it was a small commuter plane
like a cessna 172 or a small private jet. Soon after all the news media reported flight 77 had hit the pentagon and this EYEWITNESS'
testimony was never even brought up again.
If I was a reporter even worth a dime I would call this eyewitness
back and at least verify what he in fact saw. But they never did. To my knowledge, he's never been talked to since.
I'm not saying it WAS this low flying small plane that hit the Pentagon, or even that it's not flight 77. I'm just saying
it's curious that they didn't even ask the question that morning of WHY there was apparent confusion between the eyewitnesses
and the government position (that flight 77 hit the Pentagon).
Of course if flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon,
then where is it? Was it shot down elsewhere?
A group of photographers in France are challenging the public to look through photos
of the Pentagon (of which they have an archive) to find any evidence that Flight 77 really did crash into the building.
